Life...A Small Spark Between Two Eternities

Thursday, January 07, 2010

Get Back to Work

Here is a complete email list of all MPs currently serving/marking time in Ottawa until their pension kicks in. There is no charge to use this service, it is FREE FREE FREE FREE GRATIS! You simply

Click on a link and e mail away

Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,

Aglukkaq.L@parl.gc.ca,

lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,

Abbott.J@parl.gc.ca,

Albrecht.H@parl.gc.ca,

Allen.Ma@parl.gc.ca,

Allen.M@parl.gc.ca,

Allison.D@parl.gc.ca,

Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca,

Anders.R@parl.gc.ca,

Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca,

Andre.G@parl.gc.ca,

Andrews.S@parl.gc.ca,

Angus.C@parl.gc.ca,

Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca,

Ashfield.K@parl.gc.ca,

Ashton.N@parl.gc.ca,

Asselin.G@parl.gc.ca,

Atamanenko.A@parl.gc.ca,

Bachand.C@parl.gc.ca,

Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca,

Bains.N@parl.gc.ca,

Baird.J@parl.gc.ca,

Beaudin.J@parl.gc.ca,

Belanger.M@parl.gc.ca,

Bellavance.A@parl.gc.ca,

Bennett.C@parl.gc.ca,

Benoit.L@parl.gc.ca,

Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca,

Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca,

Bevington.D@parl.gc.ca,

Bezan.J@parl.gc.ca,

Bigras.B@parl.gc.ca,

Black.D@parl.gc.ca,

Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca,

Blais.R@parl.gc.ca,

Blaney.S@parl.gc.ca,

Block.K@parl.gc.ca,

Bonsant.F@parl.gc.ca,

Bouchard.R@parl.gc.ca,

Boucher.S@parl.gc.ca,

Boughen.R@parl.gc.ca,

Bourgeois.D@parl.gc.ca,

Braid.P@parl.gc.ca,

Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca,

Bruinooge.R@parl.gc.ca,

Brunelle.P@parl.gc.ca,

Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca,

Cadman.D@parl.gc.ca,

Calandra.P@parl.gc.ca,

Calkins.B@parl.gc.ca,

Carrier.R@parl.gc.ca,

Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,

Casson.R@parl.gc.ca,

Charlton.C@parl.gc.ca,

Chong.M@parl.gc.ca,

Chow.O@parl.gc.ca,

Christopherson.D@parl.gc.ca,

Clarke.R@parl.gc.ca,

Clement.T@parl.gc.ca,

Coady.S@parl.gc.ca,

Coderre.D@parl.gc.ca,

Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,

Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca,

Crete.P@parl.gc.ca,

Crombie.B@parl.gc.ca,

Crowder.J@parl.gc.ca,

Cullen.N@parl.gc.ca,

Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca,

Cuzner.R@parl.gc.ca,

Damours.J@parl.gc.ca,

Davidson.P@parl.gc.ca,

Davies.D@parl.gc.ca,

Davies.L@parl.gc.ca,

Day.S@parl.gc.ca,

DelMastro.D@parl.gc.ca,

Demers.N@parl.gc.ca,

Deschamps.J@parl.gc.ca,

Desnoyers.L@parl.gc.ca,

Devolin.B@parl.gc.ca,

Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca,

Dhaliwal.S@parl.gc.ca,

Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca,

Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,

Dorion.J@parl.gc.ca,

Dosanjh.U@parl.gc.ca,

Dreeshen.E@parl.gc.ca,

Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,

Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,

Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca,

Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca,

Fletcher.S@parl.gc.ca,

Folco.R@parl.gc.ca,

Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca,

Fry.H@parl.gc.ca,

Gagnon.C@parl.gc.ca,

Galipeau.R@parl.gc.ca,

Gallant.C@parl.gc.ca,

Garneau.M@parl.gc.ca,

Gaudet.Ro@parl.gc.ca,

Glover.S@parl.gc.ca,

Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca,

Goldring.P@parl.gc.ca,

Goodale.R@parl.gc.ca,

Goodyear.G@parl.gc.ca, Gourde.J@parl.gc.ca,

Gravelle.C@parl.gc.ca,

Grewal.N@parl.gc.ca,

Guarnieri.A@parl.gc.ca,

Guay.M@parl.gc.ca,

Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca,

Guimond.C@parl.gc.ca,

Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca,

HallFindlay.M@parl.gc.ca,

Harris.J@parl.gc.ca,

Harris.R@parl.gc.ca,

Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca,

Hiebert.R@parl.gc.ca,

Hill.J@parl.gc.ca,

Hoback.R@parl.gc.ca,

Hoeppner.C@parl.gc.ca,

Holder.E@parl.gc.ca,

Holland.M@parl.gc.ca,

Hughes.C@parl.gc.ca,

Hyer.B@parl.gc.ca,

Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca,

Jean.B@parl.gc.ca,

Jennings.M@parl.gc.ca,

Julian.P@parl.gc.ca,

Kamp.R@parl.gc.ca,

Kania.A@parl.gc.ca,

Karygiannis.J@parl.gc.ca,

Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca,

Kennedy.G@parl.gc.ca,

Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca,

Kent.P@parl.gc.ca,

Kerr.G@parl.gc.ca,

Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca,

Laforest.J@parl.gc.ca,

Laframboise.M@parl.gc.ca,

Lake.M@parl.gc.ca,

Lalonde.F@parl.gc.ca,

Lauzon.G@parl.gc.ca,

Lavallee.C@parl.gc.ca,

Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,

Lebel.D@parl.gc.ca,

Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca,

Lee.D@parl.gc.ca,

Lemay.M@parl.gc.ca,

Lemieux.P@parl.gc.ca,

Leslie.M@parl.gc.ca,

Lessard.Y@parl.gc.ca,

Levesque.Y@parl.gc.ca,

Lukiwski.T@parl.gc.ca,

Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca,

Lunney.J@parl.gc.ca,

MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca,

Mackay.P@parl.gc.ca,

MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca,

Malhi.G@parl.gc.ca,

Malo.L@parl.gc.ca,

Maloway.J@parl.gc.ca,

Mark.I@parl.gc.ca,

Marston.W@parl.gc.ca,

Martin.K@parl.gc.ca,

Martin.Pd@parl.gc.ca,

Martin.T@parl.gc.ca,

Masse.B@parl.gc.ca,

Mathyssen.I@parl.gc.ca,

Mayes.C@parl.gc.ca,

McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca,

McColeman.P@parl.gc.ca,

McKay.J@parl.gc.ca,

McLeod.C@parl.gc.ca,

McTeague.D@parl.gc.ca,

Menard.R@parl.gc.ca,

Menard.S@parl.gc.ca,

Mendes.A@parl.gc.ca,

Menzies.T@parl.gc.ca,

Merrifield.R@parl.gc.ca,

Miller.L@parl.gc.ca,

Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca,

Minna.M@parl.gc.ca,

McGuinty.D@parl.gc, Moore.J@parl.gc.ca,

Moore.R@parl.gc.ca,

Mourani.Ma@parl.gc.ca,

Mulcair.T@parl.gc.ca,

Neville.A@parl.gc.ca,

Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca,

Obhrai.D@parl.gc.ca,

OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca,

Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,

Oliphant.R@parl.gc.ca,

Gordon.t@parl.gc.ca,

Ouellet.C@parl.gc.ca,

Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca,

Paille.P@parl.gc.ca,

Paquette.P@parl.gc.ca,

Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca,

Patry.B@parl.gc.ca,

Pearson.G@parl.gc.ca,

Petit.D@parl.gc.ca,

Plamondon.L@parl.gc.ca,

Poilievre.P@parl.gc.ca,

Pomerleau.R@parl.gc.ca,

Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca,

Preston.J@parl.gc.ca,

Proulx.M@parl.gc.ca,

Rae.B@parl.gc.ca,

Rafferty.J@parl.gc.ca,

Raitt.L@parl.gc.ca,

Rajotte.J@parl.gc.ca,

Ratansi.Y@parl.gc.ca,

Rathgeber.B@parl.gc.ca,

Regan.G@parl.gc.ca,

Reid.S@parl.gc.ca,

Richards.B@parl.gc.ca,

Richardson.L@parl.gc.ca,

Rickford.G@parl.gc.ca,

Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca,

Rodriguez.P@parl.gc.ca,

Rota.A@parl.gc.ca,

Roy.J@parl.gc.ca,

Russell.T@parl.gc.ca,

Savage.M@parl.gc.ca,

Savoie.D@parl.gc.ca,

Saxton.A@parl.gc.ca,

Scarpaleggia.F@parl.gc.ca,

Scheer.A@parl.gc.ca,

Schellenberger.G@parl.gc.ca,

Sgro.J@parl.gc.ca,

Shea.G@parl.gc.ca,

Shipley.B@parl.gc.ca,

Sorenson.K@parl.gc.ca,

St-Cyr.T@parl.gc.ca,

Stanton.B@parl.gc.ca,

Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,

Storseth.B@parl.gc.ca,

Thibeault.G@parl.gc.ca,

Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca,

Trudeau.J@parl.gc.ca,

Tweed.M@parl.gc.ca,

Uppal.T@parl.gc.ca,

Valeriote.F@parl.gc.ca,

VanKesteren.D@parl.gc.ca,

VanLoan.P@parl.gc.ca,

Vellacott.M@parl.gc.ca,

Verner.J@parl.gc.ca,

Vincent.R@parl.gc.ca,

Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca,

Wallace.M@parl.gc.ca,

Warawa.M@parl.gc.ca,

Warkentin.C@parl.gc.ca,

Wasylycia-Leis.J@parl.gc.ca,

Watson.J@parl.gc.ca,

Weston.J@parl.gc.ca,

Weston.R@parl.gc.ca,

Wilfert.B@parl.gc.ca,

Wong.A@parl.gc.ca,

Woodworth.S@parl.gc.ca,

Wrzesnewskyj.B@parl.gc.ca,

Yelich.L@parl.gc.ca,

Young.T@parl.gc.ca,

Zarac.L@parl.gc.ca,

Pacetti.M@parl.gc.ca,

Friday, January 01, 2010

Winter Hockey Classic Jan 1 2010 at Fenway Park with Boston vs Philly

http://www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/story/2010/01/01/sp-winter-classic-preview.html

Friday, December 25, 2009

The Immortal Paul McCartney in New York

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Toronto Star Nov 17 2009

http://www.thestar.com/comment/article/726528

Your smart meter is watching

Technology's ability to reveal intimate details makes useful conservation tool a threat to privacy

A smart meter could reveal whether a home alarm system was engaged.

North America's electrical grid is one of the greatest technological achievements of the 20th century. However, at the time of its design, the main goal was to make sure the lights stayed on, with no serious thought to energy efficiency, environmental conservation, alternative energy sources, consumer-tailored choices, or cyber security. But times have changed, and today the grid offers a virtual window into your home – providing granular levels of information such as when you cook or shower, and for how long.
The information and communications technology revolution has changed our society in profound ways and these new technologies are being used to make the current electrical grid "smarter," commonly referred to as the "smart grid." But this is not the future. The deployment of smart meters in Ontario homes is already widespread, and the Ontario government has committed to installing this technology in all homes and small businesses by the end of 2010. President Barack Obama's infusion of $3.4 billion (U.S.) to build the smart grid is greatly accelerating the delivery of the program across the U.S.
Smart meters record and report electricity consumption on an hourly basis – even at the appliance level. Consumers can access their meter data and make individual choices about their energy use, benefitting by taking advantage of future rates.
While this technology is clearly beneficial in terms of valuable efforts to curb greenhouse gas emissions and reduce consumers' energy bills, it will also give rise to a new challenge – privacy protection. Privacy is the smart grid's sleeper issue. Whenever technology is utilized that targets individual consumers, there is invariably a dramatic increase in the amount of personally identifiable information that is collected and stored, leading to very real concerns regarding privacy. This is why we need to bake privacy into the smart grid at the design stage – known as "privacy by design" – a concept developed to ensure the protection of privacy by making privacy the default in the design of new technologies and business practices.
We must take great care not to sacrifice consumer privacy amid an atmosphere of unbridled enthusiasm for electricity reform. But we need not forfeit one for the other in a zero-sum manner; we can adopt a positive-sum approach, where both interests may prevail.
Information proliferation, lax controls and insufficient oversight of this information could lead to unprecedented invasions of consumer privacy. Intimate details of individual hydro customers' habits, from when they eat, when they shower, to when they go to bed, plus such security issues as whether they have an alarm system engaged, could all be discerned by the data, automatically fed by appliances and other devices, to the companies providing electric power to our homes.
These concerns, however, are not meant to scare us away from the value of monitoring electrical usage data on the grid – giving consumers more control over their electricity usage and giving electricity providers the ability to manage demand requirements – what we need to embrace is the idea that the dissemination of personal information must be done in a privacy protective and transparent manner.
That is why – along with co-author Christopher Wolf – we are releasing a white paper today,SmartPrivacy for the Smart Grid: Embedding Privacy in the Design of Electricity Conservation, which not only emphasizes the necessity of building privacy into the smart grid, but also provides guidance as to what concrete steps can be taken.
For example, data minimization is key: only the minimal amount of personally identifiable information should be provided, based on the nature of the relevant service, such as the first three digits of a postal code, which may be sufficient for services that allow for comparison of neighbourhood averages and other features such as regional electrical usage.
In addition, when an electrical utility company is sharing data with a third-party service provider, a pseudonym, such as a unique ID number, may be utilized instead of a customer's name or some other piece of information that can identify the individual. Further, third-party service providers should enter into contractual agreements not to correlate consumer data with data obtained from other sources, without the consent of the consumer. These are only a few of the steps that may be taken to ensure privacy protection on the smart grid.
The time for action is now, before the smart grid becomes a fully established part of our infrastructure. We cannot allow privacy to become the Achilles heel of this new method of energy management. The information collected on the smart grid will form a large and complex library of personal information, the mishandling of which could be highly invasive of personal privacy. There will be major concerns if consumer-focused principles of transparency and control are not treated as essential design principles. Both public and private sector organizations responsible for the processing of customers' personal information on the smart grid must ensure that privacy is embedded into the design of the smart grid, from start to finish – end-to-end.
If we give consumers assurances that their privacy is protected, we can then ensure consumer confidence and trust, which will allow for the widespread acceptance of the smart grid, in turn contributing to the overall goal of using energy in more efficient and environmentally friendly ways. We cannot and need not sacrifice privacy for energy efficiency. We can have both privacy and a fully functioning smart grid. A positive sum (win-win) outcome for all – electrical utility providers, consumers, the environment and privacy – is there for the asking.

Friday, October 02, 2009

Our Soldiers are dying for This ?

Former Canadian soldier speaks out against 'disgusting' child rape in Afghanistan

BY DAVID PUGLIESE, OTTAWA CITIZENSEPTEMBER 21, 2009

Former Cpl. Travis Schouten claims he witnessed an Afghan boy being sexually assualted by Afghan security personnel at Canada's Forward Operating Base Wilson in Afghanistan in 2006.
Photograph by: Handout, Travis Schouten
Every day, Travis Schouten lives with the image of the rape of an Afghan boy at a Canadian Forces base.

Witnessing two men, one armed with a knife, sodomize the child during an incident in late 2006 helped drive the 26-year-old to the brink of mental collapse.

But the former corporal said the assault is just the tip of an iceberg and underneath lies the systemic sexual abuse of boys at the hands of Afghanistan’s police and army. It’s something he said the Canadian Forces has turned a blind eye to.

“It’s disgusting,” said Schouten, now retired after eight years in the military. “We’re telling people that we’re trying to build a nation there and we let this happen?”

“We allow rampant abuse of young boys at the hands of what is supposed to be their finest police officers and army officers, then what does that say?”

Schouten’s allegations that Afghans were sexually abusing children at a Canadian base near Kandahar made headlines in 2008 but earlier this year, military investigators dismissed the claims as unfounded.

He is, however, not alone in voicing his concerns. Defence Department records show military police were upset about such incidents but were told not to interfere. Army officers also met in 2007 to discuss the issue of Afghan security personnel “having anal sex with young boys” but their main concern was the media would somehow find out.

Others in the military note they were told such practices were an age-old part of Afghan culture. One soldier who e-mailed Canwest News Service stated he served at the same base at another time and troops had orders to stop any rapes. But he also noted they were told the practise of “Man Love Thursdays,” as it was called, involved consenting Afghans and no one was raped by older men. The children involved were given small gifts or money in return for sex, soldiers said.

Schouten, however, questions whether a five- or six-year old child, or even an 11-year-old, can consent. “The Canadian Forces wants people to think it’s a cultural thing, that everyone is doing it, because it takes the onus of responsibility off them to stop it,” he said.

The United Nations has also questioned arguments that sex with children is a cultural issue. In July 2008, a UN special representative spoke out against the Afghan practise. “What I found was nobody talks about it; everyone says, ‘Well, you know, it’s been there for 1,000 years, so why do we want to raise this now?’ ” said Radhika Coomaraswamy. “But somebody has to raise it and it has to be dealt with.”

And not all Afghans are so accepting of what some claim is tradition. Afghan villagers this summer complained to British troops in Helmand province that Afghan police were abducting children to be used for sex.

Last year also saw an extremely rare event; three Afghan police officers who gang-raped a 12-year-old boy and his father were sent to prison.

Although reports in a Toronto newspaper noted that Schouten saw the aftermath of the attack on a young boy, he said that is not accurate. He actually entered the headquarters and witnessed two Afghan security personnel sodomizing the child. “I walked in and they were raping a kid,” he recalled. “The kid was bleeding. They guy with the camo fatigues had a knife in his hand.”

He left the headquarters shaken. The Canadian unit already had been dealing with other problems with the Afghans and his immediate options were limited. “I wasn’t going to start doing something at the scene,” he said. “I’m in the middle of the ANP headquarters. What do I do? Start shooting Afghan police? I’d get myself shot.”

Afterward, he was approached by an Afghan interpreter who worked with troops. The man had with him a couple of five-year-old boys who had also been allowed on the Canadian base. “He brought up the fact he likes to rape little boys,” Schouten said. “He’s telling me how he likes to use a knife on them.”

Schouten said after the incident, his life fell apart. He began drinking heavily. After returning from Afghanistan, he was involved in a car accident which injured one of his passengers. He went absent without leave when he was supposed to be at a psychiatrist’s appointment.

The army’s reaction was to try to dishonourably discharge him but Schouten successfully fought that. In August, he was honourably discharged on medical grounds.

Schouten wasn’t surprised the military investigation concluded his allegations were unfounded and his chain of command had not been informed of any such incidents.

Back in Canada, he told a lieutenant colonel and Defence Department officials of the incident, who in turn, informed others in the army’s leadership. However, since none of those people was in Schouten’s direct chain of command, the Canadian Forces National Investigation Service could conclude nothing was reported, he explained.

Other soldiers also were reluctant to come forward. “Guys have mortgages, they have kids," said Schouten. “If they go and get involved in this their careers will be stopped. Look what the army did to me.”

Schouten isn’t expecting anything different from an army board of inquiry launched last year. Although soldiers know Afghan security forces are having sex with kids, the issue is too explosive to deal with, he added.

Schouten said the rape and its aftermath shook his faith in the military. “In my mind, when I signed up, it was a brotherhood to me,” he explained. “I thought I was there for an established set of values and I loved that. I was wrong.”

Schouten is now rebuilding his life and is going to university. “I’m putting myself back together,” he said.

“But at the same time, I do feel people should be held accountable and people should know this is what is going on over there.”

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Behind the Veil

Monday, September 07, 2009

Now the Bad News

Looks like the CONs are up to their old tricks

http://scottdiatribe.canflag.com/2009/09/07/conservatives-tying-their-strategy-against-iggy-to-the-lowest-crudest-base-denominator/

Sunday, September 06, 2009

First the Good News !

Friday, August 28, 2009

Canada's Patronage King Stephen Harper

"We don't support any Senate appointments."
(Stephen Harper, Winnipeg Free Press, January 29, 1996)

"Despite the fine work of many individual Senators, the Upper House remains a dumping ground for the favoured cronies of the Prime Minister."
(Stephen Harper Leadership Website, January 15, 2004)

"In the 21st century, those who want to sit in the parliament of a democratic state should have a mandate from the people."
(Stephen Harper, February 7, 2006)

"A conservative government will not appoint to the senate anyone who does not have a mandate from the people."
(Conservative Party website during 2006 election)

"As everyone in this room knows, it has become a right of passage for aspiring leaders and prime ministers to promise Senate reform - on their way to the top - but once they are elected, Senate reform quickly falls to the bottom of the Government's agenda. Nothing ever gets done."
(Stephen Harper, Speech on Senate Reform before Senate Committee, September 7, 2006)

"I don't plan to appoint senators; that's not my intention."
(Stephen Harper, Cornwall Standard-Freeholder, January 14, 2006)

"Stephen Harper will cease patronage appointments to the Senate. Only candidates elected by the people will be named to the Upper House."
(Stephen Harper Leadership Website, January 15, 2004)

"I challenge Mr. Martin, once he becomes Prime Minister, to turn a page on the past, and appoint only elected Senators to the Upper House."
(Stephen Harper, Canadian Alliance Press Release, July 4, 2003)

"Canadians from Newfoundland and Labrador to British Columbia remain ashamed of Canada`s senior legislative body. They are ashamed the Prime Minister continues the disgraceful, undemocratic appointment of undemocratic Liberals to the undemocratic Senate to pass all too often undemocratic legislation."
(Stephen Harper, Hansard, March 7, 1996)

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Harper Does it Again ! (Courtesy of Gritgirl)

Saturday, August 22, 2009

"Racist" video causes furor

Native leaders and band members of a London-area First Nation are fuming over what some describe as a racist Internet video taken at a local pow-wow that mocks native people, the obese, the disabled and others.

Despite the outrage, the video remained on YouTube yesterday afternoon.

An official with the Munsee-Delaware First Nation says the band's leaders have met with police and they are exploring what other action they can take.

"People are pretty upset," said Paul Henry, Munsee-Delaware band administrator.

"It puts people in a bad light -- making fun of them -- and the band council is looking into it. We're not going to let this go away. We're exploring ways to deal with it."

The YouTube video was made during a Munsee-Delaware pow-pow July 4 and was videotaped by a person who identifies himself as Scared White Guy.

It is posted under the profile name 'Campterror.'

Read the full story here http://lfpress.ca/newsstand/News/Local/2009/08/22/10559131-sun.html

The link to the video is here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0zeqBlEGCY&feature=channel_page

Addendun : the person who made the video has now made it "Private" Guess he's scared now. His moniker was "Scared White Guy" after all

The Munsee-Delaware First Nation might want to talk this guy who now says he is half Cherokee

http://www.youtube.com/user/campterror
My comment to this moron is this.T
T

The hate you possess does more harm to the

vessel that it contains

than to the object it is directed to

I pity you

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Our young soldiers are dying for this ?

New fury over Afghan no-sex, no-food law

President enacts legislation allowing husbands to starve wives if they refuse sex
Aug 18, 2009 04:30 AM
HEIDI VOGT
ASSOCIATED PRESS
KABUL–Women's rights activists alleged yesterday that Afghan President Hamid Karzai has used a constitutional loophole to enact a law that allows minority Shiite Muslim husbands to refuse food and money to their wives if they deny them sex.

Read the full article here http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/682394